Main Injector Synchronous Timing System |
|||||||||||
|
Willem Blokland and James Steimel
|
|||||||||||
|
The Synchronous Timing System is designed to provide sub-nanosecond timing to instrumen- tation during the acceleration of particles in the Main Injector. Increased energy of the beam particles leads to a small but significant increase in speed, reducing the time it takes to com- plete a full turn of the ring by 61 nanoseconds (or more than 3 RF buckets). In contrast, the reference signal, used to trigger instrumentation and transmitted over a cable, has a constant group delay. This difference leads to a phase slip during the ramp and prevents instrumentation such as dampers from properly operating without additional measures. The Synchronous Tim- ing System corrects for this phase slip as well as signal propagation time changes due to tem- perature variations. A module at the LLRF system uses a 1.2 Gbit/s G-Link chip to transmit the RF clock and digital data (e.g. the current frequency) over a single mode fiber around the ring. Fiber optic couplers at service buildings split off part of this signal for a local module which reconstructs a synchronous beam reference signal. This paper describes the background, design, and expected performance of the Synchronous Timing System. |
|||||||||||
INTRODUCTION |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
loop that is equal to the cable delay from the LLRF to the local receiver. However, for
the Main Injector LLRF such a delay would complicate the LLRF system and might
even lead to instabilities. |
|||||||||||||||
SYNCHRONOUS TIMING |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Phase as a Function of Frequency |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
jsync |
|||||||||||||||
|
(1) |
|||||||||||||||
|
Dj |
|||||||||||||||
|
with Dw |
|||||||||||||||
Phase as a Function of Temperature |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Dt |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
with l |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dj temp |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(3) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assuming that the distribution of the temperature dependent phase shift is linear along the signal path then the local phase shift is: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dj local |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(4) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
with the value of a variable at an arbitrary location around the ring indicated by the su-
perscript local
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Djlocal |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This can be rewritten so that only one term, Dw |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dj local |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[!]t |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(6) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SIGNAL DISTRIBUTION |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(VCO) synchronized strobe and the required digital information. We choose single mode
fiber as the medium because of its low cost, low attenuation, and high bandwidth. The
low cost, $1 per foot per 24 fibers, gives it a price advantage over copper cables espe-
cially counting the number of channels per cable. The low attenuation, 0.35 dB/km,
makes it possible to passively split off a part of the signal at each of the 10 service
buildings while avoiding the use of amplifiers and associated noise. Figure 2 depicts the
loss calculation and includes losses due to connectors, splitters, and 5 km of cable. The
high bandwidth makes it possible to use the G-Link chip from Hewlett Packard [2]
which supports a stream up to 1.2 Gbit/s. The STS will use the RF (53 MHz) as a clock
and the 20 bits per clock cycle are used to carry the digitally encoded information. Fini-
sar Optical modules [3] convert the G-Link signal to 1310 nm light waves and back. The
STS will have for redundancy reasons two fibers with an active signal and a third fiber
prepared for immediate use. The remaining 21 fibers are for future use. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
FIGURE 1. |
||||||
|
||||||
|
FIGURE 2.
|
||||||
Resolution Considerations |
||||||
|
|
||||||
The Receiver |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
FIGURE 3. |
||||||||
The Transmitter |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
FIGURE 4. |
||||||||||
CONCLUSIONS |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
locally by locking to a signal from a beam pickup for those applications that don't re- quire first turn sampling. In the future we hope to improve RF signal from the LLRF to further reduce the noise in the synchronous trigger. |
|||||||||
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
REFERENCES |
|||||||||
|
[1] |
Steimel, J., "Trigger Delay Compensation for Beam Synchronous Sampling," 7th
Beam Instrumentation Workshop (BIW 96), Argonne, IL, May 1996, pp 476-482.
Yen, C.S. et al., "G-Link: A Chipset for Gigabit-Rate Data Communication,"
Hewlett-Packard Journal, 43(3), 103-116, (October 1992). |
||||||||